🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to pass a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," stated one MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who died after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.